Improve Governance Execution
12 weeks · 4 milestones
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Map the current governance structure of the organisation or team — decision rights, escalation paths, accountability assignments, and reporting lines — and identify at least three specific gaps where governance decisions are not being executed as intended. Gaps may include: decisions made at the wrong level, accountability assigned to a role that lacks the authority to execute it, escalation paths that bypass the intended decision-makers, or governance outputs (board resolutions, committee decisions) that do not translate into operational action.
Proof required
Submit a governance map (diagram or table) showing the current decision rights and reporting lines, and a written analysis of at least 500 words identifying three specific governance execution gaps. Each gap must be described with: what governance mechanism was designed to do, what is actually happening in practice, and the operational impact of the gap. ADVERSARIAL VERIFICATION: a named governance, legal, or senior operations professional (5+ years experience in governance or board-level work) must read the map and analysis and provide written confirmation that the gaps identified are substantive execution failures, not just aspirational improvements.
What gets checked
- Governance map covering decision rights, escalation paths, and accountability assignments
- 500-word analysis identifying three gaps, each with: designed behaviour, actual behaviour, and operational impact
- Written confirmation from a named governance/legal/senior operations professional (5+ years) that the gaps are substantive