Applied Psychology Case Analysis
8 weeks · 0 milestones
Produce a real applied psychology case analysis — a workplace team dynamics study, a behaviour change intervention design for a real organisation, a UX research synthesis, or an organisational culture assessment. Use a real organisation (with consent) and real observable data. Apply a named psychological framework throughout (organisational behaviour, I/O psychology, behaviour change theory, or equivalent). Proof is the case analysis plus a documented review by a practitioner with industrial-organisational, UX research, or applied psychology experience who challenges your methodology or conclusions and identifies at least one alternative interpretation. Their challenge and your written response are required parts of the proof.
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Select a published case vignette from a peer-reviewed psychology journal, a published clinical case textbook, or an ethics board case study repository. Apply two or more psychological frameworks to the vignette (cognitive-behavioural, attachment theory, psychodynamic, cognitive neuroscience, or social psychological) and produce a written analysis documenting the presenting issues, relevant theoretical explanations, and where the frameworks converge and diverge in their account of the case. All work must use published sources — never real client cases, never self-disclosure, never cases from personal clinical contact.
Proof required
Case analysis document (700+ words) identifying the published vignette with its source citation, applying two or more named psychological frameworks, documenting where they converge and diverge, and noting what additional information would change the analysis.
What gets checked
- Vignette is from a published source with full citation — not invented or drawn from personal experience
- Two frameworks are applied producing their own accounts — not two restatements of the same explanation
- Analysis notes what additional information would change the assessment — a sign of genuine clinical reasoning rather than textbook application