Prove
LiveProof-of-Work · Oct–Nov: every verified proof counts. 54 days leftAll outcomes
Mental Health

Practice Daily Nature Exposure

6 weeks · 3 milestones

Spend at least 15 minutes in a genuine natural or green outdoor setting once a day for 30 consecutive days, then guide one other person through a nature outing you designed. Proof is a timestamped 30-day log (setting, duration, sensory observation) plus a written account of guiding someone else's attention during a real outing, with their own observation. Physical/sensory framing only, no mood claims; verifiers confirm log consistency and the real guided outing, not any feeling.

Milestone map

Milestone map

3 milestones

Log 7 Days of Time in a Natural Setting

1–2 weeks (15+ min/day)

Spend at least 15 minutes in a natural or green outdoor setting — a park, trail, garden, beach, or body of water — once a day for 7 consecutive days. Log the date, duration, setting type, and one specific sensory observation (something you noticed — a sound, a texture, a change in light — not a mood or feeling statement).

Proof required

Submit your 7-day log: date, duration, setting type, and one specific sensory observation per entry — physical/sensory only, no mood labels.

What gets checked

  • Seven consecutive entries with duration (15+ minutes) and setting type named specifically
  • Sensory observations are physical and specific ('the wind picked up around minute 10 and the birds went quiet') — not emotional labels ('felt peaceful')
  • Observations vary session to session — identical entries across all 7 days suggest the log was filled from memory rather than the moment

Common mistakes

  • Counting a walk through a mostly paved urban area with minimal greenery as a 'natural setting' — the setting needs genuine trees, water, or open green space
  • Using mood language ('felt calm', 'felt refreshed') instead of a physical or sensory observation — the physical framing is deliberate
  • Logging the same generic observation every day — real attention to a natural setting produces different details each time

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Ask: 'What specifically did you notice on day 4 or 5 — a sound, something visual, a change in the air?' A real practice produces a specific sensory answer, not a mood word.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Extend to 30 Days and Track Context

4 weeks (15+ min/day)

Extend the daily practice to 30 days. From day 10 onward, add a context note: time of day, weather, and whether you were alone or with others. At the end, write a 150-word summary naming which context produced the most noticeable shift in your attention or restlessness, and a plausible physical or situational reason why.

Proof required

Submit your 30-day log (with time-of-day, weather, and solo/company context from day 10 onward) plus a 150-word summary naming your best context and a concrete reason.

What gets checked

  • 30-day log spans roughly 30 calendar days with context notes recorded from day 10 onward
  • 150-word summary names a specific context and a physical or situational reason — not a general feeling statement
  • Context notes are recorded at the time of each session, not assigned retrospectively

Common mistakes

  • Adding context notes retroactively after the 30 days are complete — recording them at the time avoids hindsight bias
  • Visiting the exact same spot at the exact same time every day, which makes the context comparison meaningless — vary the setting or time enough to compare
  • Writing the summary as a generic endorsement of 'being outside' rather than a genuine comparison across the logged contexts

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Ask: 'Which context in your log produced the biggest shift, and what's your best guess at why, physically or situationally?' The answer should reference specific logged entries, not a general impression.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Guide Someone Else Through a Nature Outing

1 week (planning + the outing)

Design and lead a nature outing for one other person, using what you learned about your own best context. During the outing, guide them to notice something specific — a sound, a texture, a view — rather than just walking and talking. Afterward, ask them to share one observation in their own words and write a 100-word account of the outing.

Proof required

Submit a 100-word account of the outing (who, where, how you guided their attention) plus the other person's observation in their own words.

What gets checked

  • Account is specific: who, where, what you asked them to notice
  • The other person's observation is in their own voice, specific and sensory — not generic praise for the outing
  • Submitter can describe one specific moment from the outing when asked without hesitation

Common mistakes

  • Taking someone on a walk and just chatting the whole time, without ever directing their attention to anything specific — the guided-noticing step is the point of this milestone
  • Writing the other person's observation in your own voice — indicates it wasn't genuinely their words
  • Choosing a setting with minimal genuine nature (a parking lot with a few trees) rather than a real green or natural space

Powstik Guide

One guided nature session for someone else, with their feedback.

Steps

  1. Pick someone willing to try it.
  2. Explain what you'll do and why, briefly.
  3. Guide them through the full session.
  4. Ask what they noticed; write it down.
  5. Choose a safe, accessible place.

Template

Who:        When:
What I explained first:
How I guided it:
Their words afterwards:
What I'd do differently:

What gets sent back

  • Only a description, no session led.
  • No feedback from the other person.
  • Health claims made to them.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Ask: 'What did you ask them to notice, and what did they actually say they saw or heard?' A real guided outing produces a specific prompt and a specific, independent answer from the other person.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

We use analytics to improve Powstik. No ads, ever.