Prove
LiveProof-of-Work · Oct–Nov: every verified proof counts. 35 days leftAll outcomes
Skills

Learn Non-Euclidean Geometry (Geometry with an Introduction to Cosmic Topology)

16 weeks · 2 milestones

Geometry with an Introduction to Cosmic Topology (Michael Hitchman (free book)), then one piece of your own. Part of the Varsity Curriculum: Mathematics.

Milestone map

Milestone map

2 milestones

Do the problem sets and write them up

7–14 weeks (14 hrs/week)

Take Geometry with an Introduction to Cosmic Topology for free and do the exercises on Möbius transformations, hyperbolic and elliptic geometry, and surfaces. Write every solution up in LaTeX and keep the source and the PDF in one public repo as you go.

Proof required

Link your public repo with the LaTeX source and the PDF of the exercises on Möbius transformations, hyperbolic and elliptic geometry, and surfaces, and show your self-check (Self-check without an answer key).

What gets checked

  • Every proof is complete and correct.
  • Computations with transformations are checked by hand or code.
  • Each step names the result it uses.

Common mistakes

  • Copying posted solutions: verifiers read the reasoning and the history.
  • A proof that skips the hard step.
  • Asking for review before the self-check.

Powstik Guide

A public repo with your LaTeX write-ups of the exercises on Möbius transformations, hyperbolic and elliptic geometry, and surfaces.

Steps

  1. Make a public repo for this course.
  2. Do one problem set at a time; typeset it in LaTeX and commit.
  3. Self-check: The book has no answer key. For each problem, name the definition or theorem every step uses; a step you cannot name is a gap. Then swap write-ups with a study partner before you ask for review.
  4. Fix what the self-check shows, and say what you fixed.
  5. Ask three people who know the topic to check it.

Template

README
Course: Geometry with an Introduction to Cosmic Topology (Michael Hitchman (free book))
What is here (problem sets, PDF):
Self-check result:
The hardest proof and why:

What gets sent back

  • Answers with no reasoning.
  • Photos of handwriting instead of typeset work.
  • Self-check not shown.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Every proof is complete and correct.
  • Computations with transformations are checked by hand or code.
  • Each step names the result it uses.
  • Pick two proofs and check every step: each argument must be correct and complete, not just present.
  • Ask about one step; the answer should be clear.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Explore a hyperbolic world

1–3 weeks (5–8 hrs/week)

Use what you learned. Make an expository write-up that proves the angle sum of a hyperbolic triangle is less than 180° and shows how area depends on it, with figures in the disk model. Typeset it in LaTeX (or a notebook with LaTeX maths) in your public repo.

Proof required

Link an expository write-up that proves the angle sum of a hyperbolic triangle is less than 180° and shows how area depends on it, with figures in the disk model, in your public repo.

What gets checked

  • The proof is complete.
  • Figures are accurate.
  • It compares the result with Euclidean and elliptic geometry correctly.

Common mistakes

  • A gap in the main argument.
  • A result stated but not proved.

Powstik Guide

An expository write-up that proves the angle sum of a hyperbolic triangle is less than 180° and shows how area depends on it, with figures in the disk model.

Steps

  1. Write one line: what you will prove or show.
  2. Draft it, then read it cold the next day.
  3. Ask someone to read it and mark the first step they doubt.
  4. Fix it and typeset the final version.
  5. Ask three people to check it.

Template

Title:
What this shows:
Main result (statement):
Proof:
What I would look at next:

What gets sent back

  • A main step left unproved.
  • Not clearly the person's own work.
  • Claims more than it proves.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • The proof is complete.
  • Figures are accurate.
  • It compares the result with Euclidean and elliptic geometry correctly.
  • Every argument must be correct and complete; mark the first gap you find.
  • Check that the work is the person's own.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.