Prove
LiveProof-of-Work · Oct–Nov: every verified proof counts. 34 days leftAll outcomes
Skills

Learn Organizational Behavior (OpenStax)

16 weeks · 2 milestones

Organizational Behavior (OpenStax Organizational Behavior (free book)), then one piece of your own. Part of the Varsity Curriculum: Business Administration.

Milestone map

Milestone map

2 milestones

Do the exercises and show your work

7–14 weeks (4 hrs/week)

Take Organizational Behavior for free and do the chapter questions and cases (motivation, teams, conflict, power, culture, change). Keep your answers in one public place (a repo, a shared folder or a page) as you go, with your reasoning shown.

Proof required

Link your public folder with the chapter questions and cases (motivation, teams, conflict, power, culture, change), and show your self-check (Organizational Behavior: end-of-chapter questions).

What gets checked

  • Case answers use a named model correctly.
  • Each answer says what the model cannot explain.
  • Review questions are checked against the key.

Common mistakes

  • Answers copied from a key: verifiers read the reasoning.
  • Numbers with no working.
  • Asking for review before the self-check.

Powstik Guide

A public folder with your worked answers to the chapter questions and cases (motivation, teams, conflict, power, culture, change).

Steps

  1. Make a public folder or repo for this course.
  2. Do one chapter or problem set at a time and save it.
  3. Self-check: Answer each chapter's review questions before you read the answer. Where the book gives an answer key, mark yourself against it; for the rest, check each answer against the chapter text and note the section. Write down what you got wrong.
  4. Fix what the self-check shows, and say what you fixed.
  5. Ask three people who know the topic to check it.

Template

README
Course: Organizational Behavior (OpenStax Organizational Behavior (free book))
What is here:
Self-check result:
The hardest question and why:

What gets sent back

  • Answers with no working.
  • Self-check not shown.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Case answers use a named model correctly.
  • Each answer says what the model cannot explain.
  • Review questions are checked against the key.
  • Pick two answers and check every step.
  • Ask about one step; the answer should be clear.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Run a four-week team log

1–3 weeks (5–8 hrs/week)

Use what you learned. Make a four-week log of a real group you belong to (decisions, conflict, motivation), applying two models from the course, and a change you tried with the result. Put it where verifiers can open it. Use public information, or data you have permission to use; never publish a real person's private details.

Proof required

Link a four-week log of a real group you belong to (decisions, conflict, motivation), applying two models from the course, and a change you tried with the result, and a short note on what you decided or changed because of it.

What gets checked

  • There is an entry for each week, written at the time.
  • The two models are applied correctly.
  • The change and its result are reported honestly, including if it failed.

Common mistakes

  • Invented or unsourced figures.
  • A conclusion the evidence does not support.

Powstik Guide

A four-week log of a real group you belong to (decisions, conflict, motivation), applying two models from the course, and a change you tried with the result.

Steps

  1. Write one line: what you will show.
  2. Gather the real data, people or documents.
  3. Draft it, then read it cold the next day.
  4. Ask someone to mark the first claim they doubt.
  5. Fix it and ask three people to check it.

Template

Title:
What this shows:
Sources:
Method:
Result:
Limits:

What gets sent back

  • Unsourced numbers.
  • Not clearly the person's own work.
  • Claims more than it shows.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • There is an entry for each week, written at the time.
  • The two models are applied correctly.
  • The change and its result are reported honestly, including if it failed.
  • Check that the work is the person's own and the sources are real.
  • Ask how a number was found.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.