Prove
LiveProof-of-Work · Oct–Nov: every verified proof counts. 34 days leftAll outcomes
Skills

Learn Operations Management (MIT 15.760B)

16 weeks · 2 milestones

Operations (MIT OpenCourseWare), then one piece of your own. Part of the Varsity Curriculum: Business Administration.

Milestone map

Milestone map

2 milestones

Do the exercises and show your work

7–14 weeks (8 hrs/week)

Take Operations for free and do the problem sets and cases (process analysis, capacity, inventory, quality, queues, supply chains). Keep your answers in one public place (a repo, a shared folder or a page) as you go, with your reasoning shown.

Proof required

Link your public folder with the problem sets and cases (process analysis, capacity, inventory, quality, queues, supply chains), and show your self-check (15.760B: problem sets and exams).

What gets checked

  • Every calculation shows its inputs and units.
  • The bottleneck is found correctly in each process.
  • Exam answers are marked with the corrections.

Common mistakes

  • Answers copied from a key: verifiers read the reasoning.
  • Numbers with no working.
  • Asking for review before the self-check.

Powstik Guide

A public folder with your worked answers to the problem sets and cases (process analysis, capacity, inventory, quality, queues, supply chains).

Steps

  1. Make a public folder or repo for this course.
  2. Do one chapter or problem set at a time and save it.
  3. Self-check: Do each problem set and exam under time, then mark yourself against the solutions where the course posts them. Where it does not, rework the numbers in a spreadsheet and check that every total ties out.
  4. Fix what the self-check shows, and say what you fixed.
  5. Ask three people who know the topic to check it.

Template

README
Course: Operations (MIT OpenCourseWare)
What is here:
Self-check result:
The hardest question and why:

What gets sent back

  • Answers with no working.
  • Self-check not shown.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Every calculation shows its inputs and units.
  • The bottleneck is found correctly in each process.
  • Exam answers are marked with the corrections.
  • Pick two answers and check every step.
  • Ask about one step; the answer should be clear.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Measure and improve one real process

1–3 weeks (5–8 hrs/week)

Use what you learned. Make a before-and-after study of one real process (a queue, a kitchen, an order flow) with timed observations on at least 20 runs, the bottleneck, one change and the measured result. Put it where verifiers can open it. Use public information, or data you have permission to use; never publish a real person's private details.

Proof required

Link a before-and-after study of one real process (a queue, a kitchen, an order flow) with timed observations on at least 20 runs, the bottleneck, one change and the measured result, and a short note on what you decided or changed because of it.

What gets checked

  • The 20 or more observations are shown.
  • The bottleneck is supported by the data.
  • The after-measurement is real and the improvement is not overstated.

Common mistakes

  • Invented or unsourced figures.
  • A conclusion the evidence does not support.

Powstik Guide

A before-and-after study of one real process (a queue, a kitchen, an order flow) with timed observations on at least 20 runs, the bottleneck, one change and the measured result.

Steps

  1. Write one line: what you will show.
  2. Gather the real data, people or documents.
  3. Draft it, then read it cold the next day.
  4. Ask someone to mark the first claim they doubt.
  5. Fix it and ask three people to check it.

Template

Title:
What this shows:
Sources:
Method:
Result:
Limits:

What gets sent back

  • Unsourced numbers.
  • Not clearly the person's own work.
  • Claims more than it shows.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • The 20 or more observations are shown.
  • The bottleneck is supported by the data.
  • The after-measurement is real and the improvement is not overstated.
  • Check that the work is the person's own and the sources are real.
  • Ask how a number was found.

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.