Policy Analysis and Recommendation
10 weeks · 0 milestones
Produce a real policy brief addressed to a named decision-maker (a specific government department, parliamentary committee, or named NGO) on a real, current policy question. Include: a problem statement with evidence, at least two policy options with documented trade-offs and political feasibility assessment, and a concrete recommendation. Proof is the policy brief plus a documented expert challenge session with a policy practitioner or political scientist who questions the feasibility of your recommended option — your written summary of the challenge and your response to it are required as part of the proof.
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Select a real policy problem in a specific jurisdiction — a health, education, transport, housing, or social welfare policy — and produce a structured policy context assessment: the problem definition with supporting evidence (statistics, research, or official reports), the current policy response and its documented weaknesses, the stakeholders involved and their interests, and the political feasibility constraints that any recommendation must work within. Use real official sources: government statistics, parliamentary or congressional reports, academic policy research.
Proof required
Policy context assessment document (600+ words) covering: problem definition with at least two cited evidence sources, current policy response with documented weaknesses, stakeholder map with interests, and political feasibility constraints relevant to this jurisdiction and policy area.
What gets checked
- Problem definition is supported by real cited evidence — not anecdotal or asserted
- Current policy weaknesses are documented from real sources — not just 'the current policy is not working'
- Feasibility constraints are specific to this jurisdiction and policy area