Reach Spanish B2

Proof required

Record a 6-minute unscripted opinion or narrative in Spanish. Include: at least 2 imperfect subjunctive constructions (si hubiera/tuviera/pudiera..., ojalá tuviera..., quería que viniera...), at least 1 subjunctive in a relative clause ('busco algo que sea...', 'no hay nadie que pueda...'), and at least 3 idiomatic expressions a non-Spanish speaker would be unlikely to produce (not basic idioms but natural colloquial phrases). Write 150 words on which Spanish variety (Peninsular, Mexican, Argentine, Colombian, etc.) you've been most exposed to and how it affects your production.

What gets checked

• The imperfect subjunctive forms are correctly conjugated — '-ra' forms (tuviera, pudiera, viviera) vs. '-se' forms; both are correct but learners who use imperfect subjunctive at all at B2 typically have a preferred form; errors in stem are diagnostic
• The three idiomatic expressions are genuinely idiomatic and not common learner phrases — ask yourself: would a B1 learner who studied from a textbook know this expression? If yes, it may not demonstrate B2 idiomatic range
• The Spanish variety account is specific: it names linguistic features associated with that variety (voseo in Argentina, ceceo in parts of Spain, chilenismos, etc.) that the submitter has absorbed through exposure

Common mistakes

• Treating the imperfect subjunctive as 'optional B2 grammar' and only using present subjunctive — the imperfect subjunctive is extremely common in Spanish conditionals and reported speech; its absence from B2 production is immediately noticeable to native speakers
• Developing exposure exclusively to one Spanish variety (e.g., Latin American Spanish from media) and then being confused by Peninsular Spanish in conversation — B2 requires some cross-variety comprehension, even if production remains in one variety

Resources

What a verifier looks for

• Check the imperfect subjunctive stems: 'tuviera' (tener), 'pudiera' (poder), 'viviera' (vivir) — stem-change errors (tuvara, podera) are B1 production; consistent correct forms indicate genuine B2 internalization
• Ask the submitter to explain each idiomatic phrase: why would a native speaker say this? Can they use each one in a new sentence constructed on the spot?
• The Spanish variety account should name specific linguistic features — ask the submitter: 'What's one thing about how Spanish speakers from [their variety] sound that is different from [another variety]?'

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Proof required

Submit the recording (45 minutes, both sides clearly audible). Write 300 words on: your strongest Spanish argumentation moment (describe the constructions used including any imperfect subjunctive), one moment where the native speaker's Spanish escaped your comprehension at a discourse level and how you recovered, and one phrase the native speaker used that you hadn't heard before.

What gets checked

• The argumentation account is specific about Spanish constructions: B2 Spanish argument uses discourse connectors (sin embargo, no obstante, a pesar de que, aunque, dado que, puesto que, en cambio) and the subjunctive in concessive and conditional clauses; their presence distinguishes B2 argument from B1 opinion-sharing
• The discourse comprehension failure is distinct from word-level failure — at B2, what escapes comprehension is sometimes a fast idiomatic phrase, an ironic register shift, a cultural reference, or a B2-level construction used at full speech speed
• The new phrase is genuinely new — not something from standard B2 materials; native speaker expressions at B2 include regional expressions, colloquial idioms, and conversational register phrases that textbooks don't cover

Common mistakes

• Choosing 'abstract topics' but actually discussing only personal opinions on familiar social topics — B2 requires engaging with the native speaker's actual argument, not just taking turns expressing personal views; genuine back-and-forth debate is the standard
• Using only present subjunctive in arguments when imperfect subjunctive is grammatically required — 'si tuviera más tiempo' (B2) vs. 'si tengo más tiempo' (B1 workaround); the imperfect subjunctive conditional is the B2 argumentation marker

Resources

What a verifier looks for

• Look for imperfect subjunctive conditionals in the argumentation account — 'si tuviera / si pudiera / si hubiera sabido' — these are the B2 argumentation markers; present subjunctive or indicative conditionals place the argumentation at B1
• Ask the submitter to reproduce the new phrase they heard in a sentence they make up right now — genuine acquisition from conversation enables immediate reuse
• Ask whether the native speaker's argument changed the submitter's position — B2 conversation should involve real engagement with the other person's reasoning; if the answer shows no engagement with what the native speaker actually argued, the exchange may have been parallel rather than dialogic

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Proof required

Submit the title of the film/series and a screenshot confirming it was watched. Write 400 words entirely in Spanish: a plot summary, your interpretation of a key scene or theme, one aspect of the Spanish language in the film that was most difficult and why (regional accent, colloquial expression, fast pace), and one element of Spanish or Latin American culture the film revealed. Then record a 15-minute discussion of the film in Spanish with a native speaker (both sides audible).

What gets checked

• The Spanish summary is the submitter's own production — not a translation from an English review; errors at B2 level are expected and acceptable but the text should reflect genuine viewing comprehension in Spanish
• The language difficulty account is specific to the film's actual Spanish: the regional accent (Madrid Spanish, Mexican Spanish, Argentine Spanish, Chilean Spanish), a specific colloquial expression, or a feature of the film's dialogue style — this verifies the film was actually watched without subtitles
• The discussion recording involves genuine exchange — the native speaker should be responding to the submitter's actual analysis, not to a prepared summary; the conversation should show two people who've watched something talking about it

Common mistakes

• Watching with Spanish subtitles on and reporting it as unsubtitled — Spanish subtitles are a reading task; the specific question about what was difficult in the audio verifies whether the film was actually watched without subtitles
• Choosing a dubbed film (English film with Spanish dubbing) rather than an original Spanish-language production — dubbed Spanish lacks the authentic prosody, regional accents, and natural speech patterns that make film-without-subtitles the definitive B2 listening test

Resources

What a verifier looks for

• The language difficulty account is the B2 listening gate: ask the submitter to describe one specific moment in the film that was hard to follow and to reproduce approximately what was said in Spanish
• Ask one specific content question about the film that requires genuine comprehension: a character motivation, a key plot decision, a theme the film addresses — something only answerable if the film was actually watched in Spanish
• Ask the submitter to identify the Spanish variety of the film — Peninsular, Mexican, Argentine, Chilean, etc. — and name one specific phonological or lexical feature that identified it

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.