Reach Italian A2

Proof required

Record a 2–3 minute audio in Italian describing how you spent last weekend. Use at minimum 5 verbs in passato prossimo — at least 2 taking essere (sono andato/a, sono arrivato/a, sono uscito/a) and at least 2 taking avere (ho mangiato, ho visto, ho fatto). Also use at least 2 verbs in imperfetto for background states or ongoing past actions (era, stavo, faceva).

What gets checked

• Essere/avere auxiliary selection is correct for all 5 passato prossimo verbs — using avere with motion verbs (ho andato instead of sono andato) is the most common A2 Italian error and the clearest signal that this grammar has not consolidated
• Imperfetto is used for genuine background state or ongoing action — not as an alternative past tense for completed events (ho mangiato = I ate, mangiavo = I was eating / I used to eat)
• Vocabulary covers the familiar-topics register — the narration should not be restricted to home and family; it must reflect at minimum food, movement, and one additional activity or topic

Common mistakes

• Using avere as the universal past auxiliary regardless of verb type — this produces intelligible but systematically non-standard Italian; native speakers understand but notice the error on every motion verb
• Applying passato prossimo to all past events including habitual or ongoing past states — Italian A2 requires choosing between passato prossimo (completed, bounded) and imperfetto (ongoing, habitual, background state); using only one tense for all past narration is a systematic error that persists to B1
• Limiting vocabulary expansion to cognates and conversation topics the learner already knows — A2 vocabulary must actively cover transport, shopping, and health; learners who only practise in comfortable registers plateau at A1+

Resources

What a verifier looks for

• The essere/avere test is the A2 Italian gate: identify the passato prossimo verbs in the recording and check auxiliary selection for each — if the submitter uses avere with andare, venire, or partire, the distinction has not been acquired; ask them to produce 3 sentences on the spot using andare, arrivare, and mangiare in passato prossimo
• Check that imperfetto is used for at least one genuine background state — 'era freddo', 'stavo dormendo', 'faceva bel tempo' are characteristic; if the recording uses only passato prossimo for all past events, the tense distinction has not been grasped
• Verify vocabulary breadth — if the narration is restricted to a single topic area (all food, or all home), prompt the submitter to describe what transport they used to get somewhere; food and movement together are the minimum A2 vocabulary test

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Proof required

Write 8 Italian sentences, labelled by type: (1–2) passato prossimo + essere, (3–4) passato prossimo + avere, (5–6) imperfetto, (7) direct object clitic (lo, la, li, or le placed before the verb), (8) modal verb + infinitive. Record yourself reading all 8 aloud.

What gets checked

• Essere/avere selection is correct in all four passato prossimo sentences — the written format removes real-time pressure; systematic errors here will persist to the speaking proof
• The two imperfetto sentences genuinely use the tense for its purpose — ongoing past state or habitual action; both using imperfetto for completed single events is not acceptable
• Clitic placement is correct — lo guardo (before the verb), not guardo lo (after); standard Italian places direct object clitics before the conjugated verb in indicative sentences

Common mistakes

• Writing all 8 sentences in 2–3 structural patterns and labelling them differently — the labels are required so the verifier can check that each sentence genuinely demonstrates the stated structure, not a variation of a familiar pattern
• Placing clitics after the verb in indicative sentences (guardo lo instead of lo guardo) — this is a direct transfer from English word order and produces ungrammatical Italian in indicative contexts
• Using the present tense or a progressive construction instead of imperfetto for habitual past ('when I was young, I played football' → da piccolo giocavo, not da piccolo stavo giocando or da piccolo gioco)

Resources

What a verifier looks for

• Verify clitic placement in the clitic sentence — lo guardo with the clitic BEFORE the verb is correct; guardo lo is the English-transfer error and produces ungrammatical Italian in indicative sentences
• Check the imperfetto sentences are used for their genuine purpose — ask the submitter verbally what the difference is between 'ho mangiato' and 'mangiavo'; inability to explain in one sentence confirms the grammar has not been conceptually grasped
• Verify modal + infinitive structure has no 'di' between modal and infinitive — voglio andare, devo studiare, posso venire; Italian modals take a bare infinitive (unlike French vouloir + infinitive after 'que' or Portuguese 'ter de')

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Proof required

Submit an unedited 10-minute (minimum) recording of an Italian conversation with a native or near-native speaker. The conversation must include at least 5 minutes of past-tense narration. After the recording, write 3 Italian sentences in your own words summarising what you discussed — these reveal whether passato prossimo and imperfetto have consolidated under production pressure.

What gets checked

• The past-tense narration section is genuinely conversational — not reading aloud from prepared notes; hesitations, self-corrections, and repairs are normal and expected at A2
• The 3 reflection sentences show correct tense selection — not all passato prossimo with no imperfetto, and no wholesale present-tense substitution for past events
• Essere/avere auxiliary selection is correct for at least 3 of 5 passato prossimo instances in the recording

Common mistakes

• Avoiding past tense entirely by steering every conversation topic to the present — 'I like pizza', 'I work in London', 'I study Italian'; if the native speaker does not prompt past narration, the learner must introduce it themselves
• Submitting 3 reflection sentences all in passato prossimo — habitual and ongoing past states require imperfetto; if the reflection contains no imperfetto, the tense distinction has not consolidated under production pressure
• Treating the post-conversation write-up as optional — the 3 Italian sentences are required and constitute part of the proof; a recording submitted without the written reflection is incomplete

Resources

What a verifier looks for

• The essere/avere test in the recording: identify 5 passato prossimo instances and check auxiliary selection; at least 3 of 5 must be correct; if all use avere regardless of verb type, A2 grammar has not been acquired
• Ask the submitter to narrate one thing they used to do as a child (habitual past → imperfetto required) and one specific thing they did yesterday (completed action → passato prossimo required); if they use the same tense for both, the distinction has not been grasped
• Read the 3 reflection sentences: at least one must use imperfetto for habitual or ongoing past action; all-passato prossimo reflection sentences confirm the tense distinction has not consolidated under production pressure

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.