Analyse a Real Cross-Cultural Business Challenge
6 weeks · 0 milestones
Identify and analyse a real, documented cross-cultural business challenge — a failed international partnership, a negotiation that broke down due to cultural misalignment, or a product that failed in a foreign market — using Hofstede or GLOBE cultural dimensions as the analytical lens. The primary evidence must include at least one interview with a professional who has direct experience with the cultural context in question. Proof is the written analysis plus interview notes, reviewed by someone with lived cross-cultural business experience who can confirm the cultural interpretation is grounded rather than stereotyped.
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Select two countries with distinct cultural profiles. Apply Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions (or Trompenaars' or Globe study frameworks) to characterise each culture's approach to business across at least four dimensions. Ground the analysis in empirical evidence beyond the framework scores — published business case examples, negotiation research, leadership studies, or academic cross-cultural research.
Proof required
Submit a cross-cultural comparison (minimum 1,200 words) covering: (a) the two countries chosen and rationale for the pairing (e.g. relevant business relationship, expansion context), (b) Hofstede or equivalent dimension scores for both countries with source, (c) four empirical examples of how cultural differences have manifested in real business interactions between these two countries or in each country's business environment, and (d) the two most practically significant cultural differences for a business professional working across these contexts.
What gets checked
- Empirical examples are real and sourced — not hypothetical illustrations
- Framework scores are from the original source (hofstede-insights.com) not secondary summaries
- Most significant differences are assessed for practical business impact, not just theoretical interest