R&D Portfolio Analysis

6 weeks · 0 milestones

Produce an analysis of a real or documented R&D portfolio using a structured portfolio management framework — stage-gate review, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) assessment, or a risk-return portfolio analysis. The analysis must include: an inventory of the portfolio projects with their current status, objectives, and resource consumption, a TRL assessment for each project (using NASA, EU Horizon, or DoD TRL definitions — all publicly documented) with documented rationale for each TRL assignment, a portfolio balance assessment evaluating the distribution of risk (short-term vs long-term projects, incremental vs breakthrough technology), identification of at least 2 projects where resource reallocation is recommended — with documented rationale — and the expected portfolio impact, and a portfolio governance recommendation covering the decision criteria that should trigger project continuation, escalation, or termination. Preferred proof: an analysis of a real R&D portfolio in an organisation you work in or have access to. Accessible alternative: portfolio analysis of publicly documented R&D programmes — annual reports, government R&D programme documentation (e.g. ARPA-E project portfolios, Innovate UK funded projects, DARPA programmes — all publicly documented) provide sufficient project data for a structured portfolio analysis. TRL definitions are freely available from NASA, ESA, and the European Commission. Proof artifacts: the TRL assessment and portfolio balance analysis (analysis artifact) and the portfolio analysis report with governance recommendations (documentation artifact). Verification: an R&D manager or CTO challenges the resource reallocation recommendation — 'you recommend stopping project X to fund project Y; what is the organisational cost of killing project X beyond the direct resource saving?' — requiring reasoning about real portfolio management trade-offs.

Sign in to start this outcome and track your progress publicly.