EdTech Evaluation & Implementation
10 weeks · 0 milestones
Evaluate a real educational technology tool by implementing it with real learners in a real educational context. Proof requires: (a) a pre-implementation evaluation framework specifying what will be measured, how, and what would count as evidence of effectiveness or ineffectiveness, (b) documented implementation records covering at least 3 sessions — what was done, what happened, and what was observed, (c) anonymised learner feedback data or measurable learning outcome data collected using the framework in (a), and (d) a written evaluation report with a recommendation for or against continued use with documented evidence. A product review or literature survey without real learner data is not accepted — the implementation with measurement is the proof. If the implementation involves learners under 18, current DBS/background check clearance is required and all learner identifying information must be anonymised.
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Select one EdTech tool relevant to a specific educational context (K-12, higher education, corporate learning, or adult education). Evaluate it against a minimum of five criteria from a recognised EdTech evaluation framework (SAMR model, TPACK framework, or equivalent). Produce an evaluation report (minimum 500 words) documenting your methodology, criteria, evidence, and judgements.
Proof required
Submit your EdTech evaluation report (minimum 500 words): named framework, five or more criteria with evidence, and summary judgement on whether this tool improves learning outcomes.
What gets checked
- Evaluation uses a named recognised framework — not personal criteria
- Five or more criteria assessed with specific evidence from the tool itself
- Summary judgement addresses learning impact — not only usability or cost