Assistive Technology Evaluation
8 weeks · 0 milestones
Evaluate a real assistive technology tool for a specific identified learning need. Proof requires: (a) documentation of the learning need and the rationale for choosing this tool over alternatives, (b) a real trial with the student (supervised and anonymised) with documented observations across at least 3 sessions covering what the student was able to do with the tool, what challenges remained, and what was adapted between sessions, (c) anonymised student feedback where the student can express it, and (d) a written evaluation report with a recommendation for or against continued use. Supervised by and signed off by a SENCO, specialist teacher, or qualified AT specialist. This proof documents the STUDENT PRACTITIONER'S evaluation process — not the student's personal profile. Requires current DBS/background check clearance.
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Identify a specific learner need profile present in your SEND placement (e.g. dyslexia, visual impairment, autism spectrum, physical disability — anonymised and with SENCO/supervisor approval). Research a minimum of three assistive technologies relevant to that need. For each, document: the specific need it addresses, evidence base, cost and accessibility, and any relevant accessibility standards (e.g. WCAG 2.1 for digital tools). All learner information must be anonymised.
Proof required
Submit your AT options research document: three AT tools with need profile, evidence base, cost and accessibility, and standards compliance notes (minimum one page per tool). Anonymised learner need profile included.
What gets checked
- Three distinct AT tools covering the specific named need profile — not generic AT lists
- Evidence base is cited for each tool — not manufacturer claims alone
- Anonymisation is complete — no learner names or identifying details