Urban Site Analysis
8 weeks · 0 milestones
Structured site analysis for an urban design or architecture project using real site data and publicly available mapping resources. Triad: concept/ideation artifact (analysis framework document: what aspects of the site are being analysed — movement flows, land use, microclimate, heritage assets, planning constraints, demographic context — and why each is relevant to the design brief), technical execution artifact (minimum 3 annotated maps or diagrams using real data: movement flow diagram, land use map, sun-path or shadow analysis, planning constraint overlay, or equivalent — each map interpreted, not just reproduced), documentation/critique artifact (site analysis report: what the analysis reveals about the site's opportunities and constraints, and what implications this has for the design project — a paragraph per mapped analysis minimum). Proof Accessibility Rule applies: OpenStreetMap, OS Open Data, local planning authority public portals, Google Maps, and Copernicus Climate Data Store are all freely accessible data sources — no paid GIS software required. Studio critique: urban designer or architect challenges the analysis framework and the quality of the design implications drawn. Proof: analysis framework, annotated maps (minimum 3), site analysis report, critique notes. Verifier: urban designer, ARB/RIBA-registered architect, or town planner.
Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Visit or digitally survey the site, recording physical characteristics, existing built fabric, movement patterns, climate, and social context. Produce annotated photographs or sketches, a site location map, and a research summary identifying the key constraints and opportunities the site presents for design.
Proof required
Submit your site research package: a location map, minimum 12 annotated photographs or sketches from the visit (or digital survey), and a 300-word contextual summary identifying at least three site constraints and three design opportunities.
What gets checked
- Research documents the site through multiple lenses — physical, social, environmental, and movement — not just built fabric
- Annotations explain significance, not just describe what is photographed
- Constraints and opportunities are specific to this site — not generic urban design observations